0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Austin Cline is a different thread... please try to keep up There are many structural engineers from the US and all over the world that are willing to put their reps on the line and disagree with the "official story".Do you really need me to dig up specific analysis of the building in question for you to understand the glaring oddities in the "official story"?So when it sagged did it immediately fall to the ground like it had zero structure left (almost instantly) or did it sag an slowly buckle over?
As to there being many that disagree with the "official" report-who cares? There are more that agree with it.
I am not sure you can back this up. Even if you could its likely the same people who love our new President without question. Sure I am being kinda pointed on this but sadely the masses eat the crap there fed as the truth usually. If you look at the evidence on a lot of "recent" major happenings the evidence to support the official story is weak at best. Google Dick Cheney and the words "let it happen".
If it had a few stories above it most certainly would have. I'd call 20 minutes almost instantly wouldn't you? The point is that NONE of us know a thing about what caused it to fall. Conspiracy theories are usually wrong tho. As to there being many that disagree with the "official" report-who cares? There are more that agree with it.
If the arguement is that building 7 fell in freefall, then how do you describe how the other two towers fell?
Don't change the subject.