0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Shape charges, I expect, still would require securing to the main structure to be effective. I reckon it involved thermite/thermate myself as there is some evidence to it's presence. How it got there is perhaps the next question?
And even after stating all that Fabr you will blindly accept that two buildings hit VERY differently by airplanes will fall the exact same way. If you really got a "demolitions expert" who told you that I would never trust another word out his mouth about explosives. Niether you nor I know how the charges were set. Nor if these supposed rat traps were very well laid out. Or how they were designed. They were simply a means to cover those points needed to breaks the structure. The charges placed later could have been shaped charges. These will send nearly all of thier force in the desired direction. Just gotta tell them when to go boom. BUT if what he says is true. Then the plane was not really contained to well and the major part blast would have simply went out the already shattered windows. Bunch of noise but little damage. Still does not explain the explosions from the buildings top to bottom. Boom boom boom from those who heard it and lived. Unless you want to beleive the story about Jet fuel flowing down the elevator and exploding from floor to floor..... Riiiiiiight.After inital impact the fuel was ignited then and there. NO WAY does fuel flow out of wings that are tore to shreds in a fireball THAT big and flow down floors to ignite. MUCH less up to the top too. That fuel was literally atomized as it came out of the shredded wing at the speeds they hit and ignited then and there. All else was just that. Something else.
Unless you want to beleive the story about Jet fuel flowing down the elevator and exploding from floor to floor..... Riiiiiiight.After inital impact the fuel was ignited then and there. NO WAY does fuel flow out of wings that are tore to shreds in a fireball THAT big and flow down floors to ignite. MUCH less up to the top too. That fuel was literally atomized as it came out of the shredded wing at the speeds they hit and ignited then and there. All else was just that. Something else.
WRONG.Jet fuel is basically kerosene. It burns slowly as a liquid, with less intensity than regular gasoline, but still with plenty of heat. There is hundreds of thousands of litres of it in a modern airliner. More than enough to pour out of the planes and spill all over the place.Also, the jet fuel doesn't have to flow up the elevator shafts to start fires on floors above - just the heat from the burning fuel below. In tall buildings, elevator shafts act like chimneys and funnel concentrated heat upwards.The grease on the cables and rails of the elevators can and will easily alight when exposed to such heat, and guess what happens then? The fire is excited by the immense heat travelling up the shaft is is burning in, burning grease, plastic and aluminium fall away and move down the elevator shaft (keeping the running jet fuel burning), cosequently fire spreads to other floors, both up and down.Just by the by, I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist. And I don't put much clout behind what anybody claims to know what happened in the details that day. When you fly an airliner into a building, all bets are off. You can theorise endlessly about what happened, but that's all it is, theories. There arejust too many variables involved to be able to state with any real authority, "This is exactly what happened, and how."Unless of course you repeat the experiment with proper scientific process...
We are not talking about a balloons worth of fuel here mate! Hundreds of thousands of litres, held in reinforced, self-sealing tanks...
Watch some plane crash experiments guys!!!!!!! Sheesh! Alll the fues does not instantly and completely ignite and burn.Good Gawd, it's obvious.
'Got any particular youtube (or other) links that demonstrate this? I have seen a few crashes filmed but nothing so bad as an impact like this. Be best if you had any of a plane disintegrating when it hits. This made me think of another funny fact. The "plane" that hit the Pentagon did not burn to aweful long. Wierd.
Ok now that I thought about the "plane" that hit the Pentagon its bugging me. Why did its fuel not do something similair?? I am asking here. Seems wierd it did not do anything at all like some claim the planes in the towers did. Please enlighten me.
You didn't see the fire at the Pentagon? What did it not do.I think your both partially correct on the towers. When the plane hit, it basically "strained" the plane through the side of the building. The towers were exoskeleton. The big fire ball when the plane hit was the fuel that was atomized on impact, and that there was enough oxygen to burn. I am sure there was plenty of liquid fuel left that soaked up everything on that floor and a few below, which got the fire really going.
Author
Topic: You want change? part two (Read 21805 times)
