0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I am an advocate of moving the sprockets out aways from the motor if at all possible and the bigger the better. If its not right on the motors shaft it will not get heat from the motor near as easy if at all. Longer is better of course for distance but the design of many buggies dictate what you can run with. I would have NO problems running two spockets that are so big they nearly kiss each other if I did not have a lot of distance between the drive and the driven. Being most gear boxes tend to use sprockets that are close the the same size or with minor differances I believe that two rear sprockets off a matching bike/chain with a few to no teeth count differance will yield the best results period. Even with the faster speeds the chain will cool itself better and not have near the issues. Sure its my opinion. I have always said it was. We already KNOW that small sprockets ARE NOT the answer. Right?
I am aware that is the route you are taking. My response is not based on that you are doing it, but based on my own research into it. That is not to down play your use, but to indicate I am not not just reiterating something someone else posted.One thing I have not seen anything on before is what makes a roller chain better suited to run open? While HyVo chain life would be reduced running open, would it be as bad as roller chain in this type of application?
IMO the advantage to silent is the ability to be run without a tensioner(I know there are non believers ), the advantage to roller is cost.Pick your poison. [/color]I get quite distressed when I agree with Fabr.... I really need professional help here.The other advantage of a silent is its ability to transfer large amounts of power without excess wear.But who is questioning the silents ability to run without a tensioner?Simply put, the more 'load' a silent is under, the tighter it is. It rides up (or out if you like) on the tapered teeth of its gear set. A worn silent when not turning (no load) can appear to look like it should fall off the gears its so slack.
well, I'm pretty sure fabber was thinking of me there, and ya I do disagree for the most part about silent chain not needing a tensioner. I do agree they "ELONGATE" much less than a roller, but don't kid yourself, they will gain slack and that is a bad thing. I have personally seen and performed repairs to many sled chaincases that were the victim of improper chain tension and subsequent grenading of the hyvo chain.There is a reason sleds have chain tensioners installed from the factory and it is not to make gearing changes easier. Just pick up a manual from a snowmobile manufacturer.....chain tensioning is an important part of regular maintenance no matter how many miles are on it.Again, I still say I agree that tensioning is far less of an issue with silent chain than it is with roller, as roller "EEEELLLLLOOONNNNGGGGAAAAATTTEEEESSS" far more rapidly than hyvo