0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The theory of antidive is for just that. Keeping the front end from "diving" during HARD braking and works fantastic on street cars and limited travel. There's not any modern front suspensions without it that I know of. However,that said I see the difficulties of trying to get usable antidive on anything with long travel. Does that mean that it cannot be designed to function in a limited range of "normal" travel such as the middle section of travel we mostly see?? Hell I don't know but if it can be ,IMO,it would be foolish to intentionally delete it from the design. I HATE a diving front suspension. Sorry DS but this Rorty design has no antidive in it. You'll damn sure get a ride if I get the thing done in time for LS. The tranny stuff is really coming together now.
if anyone designs this in the future please post up pics!
Future? more like distant past LOL. This truck is about 7 years old and has many, many Baja miles on it. It uses both types of anti-dive methods to come up with a nice progressive curve. With the sticky ass short course tires on it the anti-dive might be a little much. It's about to move up to 37's finally, should be better.
The clock is ticking for the LS trip. Are you getting close to completion
I really think this is going to hold up well, I better come take a look at it this week and make sure you keep moving forward! Keep moving!
Damn, how big are those outside heim joints ?
Jig transfers to the top to knock out the uppers as well[Note to self - Purchase a new Square]