That .09 is 25% more wear.  I would call that substantial more wear. I think the LE grease is likely substantially better than the 101 but the 165/164 is better than both. I have seen no visible wear in my 934 cv's using it. I did need to replace one 934 due to a soft spot in one of the ball tracks. No grease will help with that.

An additional .09 mm wear at 176* f. I have been using swepco 101. Ill have to look up the specs on it later.

I've been using https://www.swepcolube.com/products/swepco-165-molyxp-extreme-pressure-grease/ the last 3 years or so. I like it as it has plenty of cling yet will flow and not dry out.

That sucks your feeling it and hope uts not bad

Your rail is def tough enough to take a hit. It just happens sometimes. Like getting bumped in the trails 

The chassis took the hit well. I got the body panels and belly pan off today and was able to determine the main double tube spine was not bent at all ,just a very small twist of the front bulkhead and the triangulations did their job keeping almost all in line. The mounting tabs were intended to be what would be sacrificed/crumple if the arms took a hit and did their job well also. Was able to straighten the crumpled tabs and check the resulting alignment. 6* caster/1.5* camber passenger side and 4.5*caster/.5*camber driver side. Zero toe . Should only take a turn or 2 to bring it into spec.. Damn glad I made those tabs to crumple. I am betting there would have been much more damage if I hadn't.

Great pics.

Video??